The Dangerous Seduction of Clarity
When clarity narrows our vision, and dissonance opens it
This article is a collaboration with Cécile Cremer. Check out her publication Wandering the Future to explore signals, provocations and scenario tools for those thinking beyond the next quarter.
If Medium is your go-to reading spot, you can catch this post there too! Just click here.
What if the questions we’re not supposed to ask are the ones that crack everything open?
We’re taught to pursue certainty. Clear questions, clear answers, clear decisions. This signals rigour, professionalism and a steady hand.
But what if that same clarity is quietly keeping us stuck? There’s a kind of question that doesn’t feel ‘productive’ at first, it might even feel ‘wrong’. It’s too speculative, too awkward. These are the questions that never make it into stakeholder briefs or interview guides. And yet, they’re the ones that can shortcut the obvious and unlock something genuinely new.
For example:
What if Gen Z never works full-time and sees career as a temporary side quest?
What if the internet vanishes in 2035, not because of tech failure but because we choose to turn it off?
What if ‘growth’ becomes our biggest liability?
These are ‘wrong’ questions. Not because they’re illogical, but because they violate an unspoken rule. They break the rhythm of polite, linear thinking. And that disruption is exactly what makes them powerful.
What Makes a Question ‘Wrong’?
Cécile, with her background as a foresight strategist, describes wrong questions as those that feel emotionally charged, slightly absurd or simply out of place.
In foresight work, the aim isn’t to predict what will happen, but to stretch the field of what could happen, feed the imagination. That means asking questions that feel unreasonable in the present, but plausible in some version of the future:
What if no one wants to lead anymore, not even AI?
What if school becomes a voluntary space people only visit for social rituals?
These questions are designed to reorient the conversation. They expand the frame and often expose assumptions we didn’t realise we were making.
Wrong questions can sound naive. But naïveté, in futures work, is a feature, not a flaw. It’s what allows us to see past the structures we’ve absorbed without noticing.
If a question feels risky to ask, that’s usually a sign it’s worth asking.
The Limits of a Focused Question
We often prize clarity in research and strategy. A focused question feels productive: it’s tidy, measurable, easy to drop into a survey or slide deck. But that tidiness can come at a cost.
Take something: “How satisfied are you with your current provider?”
It sounds rigorous. But, beneath the surface, it’s already decided what matters. It assumes satisfaction is the right metric. That the provider is the right unit of analysis. So you can see how clarity can quietly narrow the lens.
That doesn’t make these questions useless - very far from it! They’re essential when you need consistency, benchmarking or directional signals. But they rarely touch the messy edge of things, where breakthroughs often sit.
Sometimes, the most valuable question does not fit neatly on a Likert scale. It’s the one that forces us to ask: “What’s missing from how we’re framing this?”
A Survival Guide for Asking Wrong Questions Well
1️⃣ Make it unsettling, not incoherent. You want productive tension, not confusion. The goal is to surface resistance.
Try questions like:
If this idea failed, what reason would we least want to admit?
What’s a truth we have trained ourselves not to see anymore?
These questions make us notice what we’ve normalised. And in that moment of friction, new insight becomes possible.
2️⃣ Use metaphors, taboos and paradoxes. Wrong questions often work best when they borrow language from somewhere else: narrative, moral, emotional, even poetic. They pull us out of operational mode and into reflective mode.
What if the thing we are trying to fix is the glue holding us together?
What if our biggest ‘win’ was actually a strategic dead end?
By gently shaking people out of their comfort zone, they break free - even briefly - from their usual filters and generate more original insights.
The less familiar the framing, the harder it is for the brain to reach for its usual shortcuts.
3️⃣ Make space for futures that don’t yet exist. In futures work, we’re rehearsing possibilities, and the future rarely arrives in a straight line. It appears at the edges - in weak signals, contradictions and concepts we don’t yet have words for.
It flickers into view when we ask questions strange enough to unsettle the present.
What if this whole industry dissolves into a community-owned network?
What future would scare us most if it started tomorrow morning?
What aren’t we building because we haven’t dared to name it yet?
These aren’t dramatic for the sake of it - they’re diagnostic. They expose what our mental models leave out, and what our strategies can’t yet see.
When Wrong Questions Go Wrong
This kind of question-asking doesn’t work everywhere.
If you’re mid-decision, or if the room is already tense, dropping “What if none of this matters?” won’t help. Wrong questions need the right conditions: curiosity, psychological safety, timing.
They’re most useful early on, when you’re still framing the problem - not when you’re closing in on a decision. They also require trust in the process.
If your culture sees questions as signs of weakness or delays, you’ll need to do some groundwork first. And readiness is both emotional and cognitive: if the context can’t handle doubt, even the best question will land flat. That’s simply a signal about the system, and not necessarily an issue with the question itself!
Try One This Week
The art of questioning is knowing when to break the rhythm, zoom out and take a risk.
So here’s a challenge: ask one wrong question this week.
In a meeting. In your research. In a quiet moment. Ask something that feels naive, provocative or even a little dangerous. See what happens.
The questions that don’t fit can show us what’s really there - and what’s been missing all along.
I'm Andrea, a management consultant with over a decade of experience across industry and academia. I work with commercial, non-profit, academic and government organisations worldwide, helping them capture meaningful insights through mixed methods research.
I write about practical frameworks to help you discover what others miss. My main goal is to translate complex concepts into techniques that readers can use immediately.
 | A guest post by
|
It was such a pleasure creating this article with you ✨🫶🏼 let’s ask more “wrong questions”